|
We are all in the same boat
It's been three months since President Ricardo Maduro began a battle against merciless criminals. Despite having a very personal style, his plan is supported not just by a specific sector of the country's society, but rather by all. By those of us who are not criminals but rather the true citizens of Honduras.
The international arm of crime that embraces our country is one of the main obstacles of the eradication process.
A while back, we noticed that the place of choice for unloading stolen goods, especially antiques, is in the countries north of Honduras. Unfortunately, the Central American police corps have not worked together, except for on a few specific cases, a fact that makes us think it would be wise to increase information exchange and thus improve efficiency.
Criminals throughout the region know one another. Frequently they convince members of the different police forces to join their ranks or use their influences to get them rotated as frequently as possible, thus escaping detection.
The diversity of criminal acts in our region is leaving serious and unforgivable traces of bitterness and feelings of impotence in our citizens. These feelings explain the position of several sectors that demand more severe punishment for law offenders such as castration and the death penalty, which are totally opposed by the Catholic Church.
In the past and as a response to crime, some societies used to organize "social cleansing" squads. This practice was eventually denounced, and as a consequence, criminality rose.
Some of our readers have written to us to confirm whether or not Honduran immigrants in the U.S. are imprisoned in that country. Our reaction was surprise, as we know these people have left Honduras for a very different reason, the search for a better life. However, it is true that a small percentage of them have fallen into the claws of crime, and if they come back with those ideas, they will certainly find resistance here as well.
Although high crime rates are relatively new in Honduras in comparison to other Central American countries, it is also true that police authorities from all five countries have been uncooperative with each other, claiming matters of national security.
As we mentioned previously, we are under the impression that national authorities are fighting against crime without taking into consideration the permanent supply of international activity. This fact must be analyzed correctly.
Work against crime has been an arduous task, and serious achievements have been attained. A remarkable one is the creation of the Tourist Police in the city of Tela, news met with joy, as it lead to an automatic decrease in the crime rate, while tourism has begun to re-emerge strongly. A clear sign that honesty also pays.
The people must support our authorities unconditionally. This is not about political parties, it is about surviving and social coexistence. For a long time now, we have been observing a pair of thieves who snatch chains off people's necks on Boulevard Miraflores in Tegucigalpa. Their names are Oscar and Will. We know where they live, their civil status, profession and origins.
Our attitude to them has been limited to rolling up car's windows and locking the doors while waiting for several years now for our authorities to uncover them and bring them to justice. At the present time, they have been missing for around three months, and we are waiting for a follow up of their story.
It is imperative to do something now, or soon we will find ourselves submerged in a culture of crime. President Maduro must be aware that all the Honduran society is standing right by him in this battle, and that we all repel crime. The president's task must be everybody's task. We don't want to hear accusations from one person to another every time an innocent life falls... we are all in the same boat.
The United States of America as banker, policeman and sanctuary for excess populations
By LORENZO DEE BELVEAL
Special to Honduras This Week
As had been so truly said, some people are never satisfied. The long line of potential beneficiaries of the world's only remaining super-power are clearly having trouble coming to grips with the fact that even a super-power lives within its limitations.
Example: Mexican Presidente Vicente Fox clearly evidenced his outspoken disappointment recently, with the failure of the United States to legislate permanent status to millions of Mexican illegal immigrants who have opted for life on the north side of the Rio Bravo, rather than domicile in their own native land. This in spite of the fact that establishment of branch plants in Mexico by American companies is said to comprise the fourth or fifth largest source of non-farm income and commercial employment in Mexico.
This economic benevolence, however, does not even come close to meeting Mexican expectations. In addition, Mexico looks to the United States to accept and regularize millions of their illegal 'transplants' into the national territory of their northern neighbor - and make the illegal invasion permanent via some kind of statutory enactment. And to do all of this in the name of "good neighborliness"!
Honduras offers a different case, but with a similar end result. As a proximal result of "Hurricane Mitch", a tidal wave of illegal Hondurans fled north, in search of improved economic opportunities.
In recognition of the human hardships involved in their native land, the United States enacted a Temporary Protection Statute which had the effect of affording the illegal Hondurans sanctuary, pending the post-hurricane clean-up and restoration that was ostensibly going to be bankrolled by countless millions of dollars in foreign donations, loans, etc.
But Hurricane Mitch arrived in 1998.
This is 2002. The Temporary Protection Statute has been extended three times, and Honduras still seems no closer to welcoming its fleeing thousands of storm refugees back today than it was a year or two ago. Instead, the present effort increasingly seems directed to wangling statutory arrangement to enable the Honduran illegals to obtain some kind of legal status that will enable them to remain in the U. S. permanently, rather than returning to the land of their birth.
The Temporary Protection Statute, it now seems obvious, is in the throes of being somehow rendered permanent. And the illegal Honduran immigrants who were afforded temporary humanitarian safe haven from the ravages of Hurricane Mitch are now seeking ways of making their temporary arrangement permanent as well.
At the risk of placing needless emphasis on the perfectly obvious, this turn of events was not contemplated in the original arrangements. The Temporary Protection Statute was foreseen to be a temporary measure, in response to what was presented to be a temporary crisis.
Or is this merely nit-picking, deemed unworthy of a great nation?
Argentina has recently been filled with economic travail borne of an ill-starred decision to "dollarize" its economy; This, on the illusory notion that the fiction of a dollarized economy would somehow free Argentina from the harsh realities of the usual fiscal restraints.
But in due course Argentina made the disastrous discovery that - whether pesos or dollars - the fundamentals of arithmetic do not change enough to make any noticeable metamorphosis in the bottom line of national bookkeeping. Two-plus-two stubbornly remains four - whether pesos or dollars.
Now Argentina seethes with resentment that when their fiscal folly resulted in a melt-down of both their domestic economy and their banking system, the United States did not promptly ride to their rescue with additional billions of dollars to prop up their flawed and floundering monetary system.
The implication seems to be that, since Argentina got into its financial mess via the abuse of borrowed dollars and dollar indebtedness, it is somehow the responsibility of the United States to provide the wherewithal to save the Argentine system from the predictable results of its own wrongheaded economic excesses.
These are but three examples in which the performance of the United States has fallen far short of the full expectations of present and potential beneficiaries. Except for inflexible limitations of space, the list could be much longer.
What it amounts to is that hopeful recipients of super-power largesse recognize no limitations on the potentials of same. They view the charitable parameters - and the implied obligations - of their larger contemporary to be almost - if not entirely - limitless. Hence, failure to fully meet their lofty expectations tends to be chalked up to mean spiritedness and national stinginess, rather than very real strictures based on harsh economics and practical political realities.
The realization has yet to permeate the national awareness of the nations seeking help, that even a super-power faces real limitations on its functional and fiscal generosity. The political and economic demands involved in being the world's policeman, its banker, its protector and its haven for excess population may at times even outstrip the capabilities and resources of a super-power. Beyond this, the American taxpayers - from who all the hoped-for economic blessing must necessarily flow - do not see it as their obligation to serve as a money-tree to a planet full of admittedly needful, if improvident, sovereign charity cases.
Americans are a charitable people, but there must be limitations, even to charity.
So what's wrong with this global equation?
Begin with the fact that global priorities are dictating their own terms. The war on terror has relegated everything else to second or third place as concerns U. S. Congressional, Cabinet and Presidential attention. With United States security hanging in the balance, and the next terrorist strike providing the central theme for an international guessing game, trade agreements and comparable "business as usual" concerns necessarily wind up on the back of the administrative stove.
With Pakistan and India poised eyeball-to-eyeball across a fragile line of engagement- and nuclear weapons ready to enforce the decisions of their battle-line commanders, relative trivialities like commercial trade arguments, diplomatic flaps and whaling agreements tend to pale in terms of importance. Without doubt these secondary topics of international concern will continue to receive little more than careful neglect until such time as the future of the world as we know it is somewhat more simmered down and reliably assured.
This kind of world-wide interruption in what amounts to international pending business may try the patience of many, and shake the confidence of others, but it is really quite unavoidable. First things first, as we say. Especially when the future of our planet is mortally threatened.
Whether we like it or not, September 11, 2001, changed the way the world works. The old procedures are no longer either adequate or applicable. The objectives of a great nation have ceased to be those of mere optimization, and have become the more basic concerns of survival in a frighteningly dangerous world. Until this menace is met and dealt with, everything else is assigned to a secondary order of importance. This means everything!
How could it possibly be otherwise?
So what will happen to Presidente Fox's wish for regularization of Mexico's millions of illegals now hiding out in the United States of America? What will happen to the Honduras hope for a permanent solution for those "paisanos" presently caught up in the limbo of a TPS that has been tenuously extended for one more year? What does the financial future of Argentina hold, as its banking institutions and, indeed, its basic social institutions tremble in the awful grip of an unprecedented fiscal crisis.
The answer to all of these questions - and more - is "only time will tell". But in the meantime, the future of the planet hangs in a balance between destruction by terrorism and survival via the good offices of the United States of America and a handful of like-minded allies. The issue, to re-use the ancient challenge, "remains very much in doubt".
It doesn't require genius to understand which areas of concern deserve primary attention in these confusing times.
And that will get it.

|
RESPONSE TO MR. JACK WALKER
Dear HTW:
This letter is in response to Mr. Jack Walker's letter that appeared in the Readers Forum section of Honduras This Week. Swan Island Development, LLC is a Las Vegas, Nevada based development partnership and as such is a U.S. based corporation not a Honduran corporation. Mr. Walker's Swan Island Development Corporation , S.A. is a Honduran corporation not a U.S. corporation, so Mr. Walker is making a non-relevant statement.
Swan Island Development, LLC, has the resources to develop the Swan Islands, Mr. Walker may or may not have the resources to develop even his small project that he has envisioned for the Islands.
The main point however, is that Honduras does not need another small dive or eco-resort located on the Swan Islands. The islands do have a small reef located mainly off the N.W. beach , it is not a significant reef to interest most divers in comparison to the reefs off of the Bay Islands. Building a small resort on the islands would be competing with the other Bay Island resorts and thus, not be helping the economy of Honduras or the Bay Islands.
The proposal for the Swan Islands as we envision it would not compete with the Bay Islands or the Main land hotels and resorts, as we are not targeting the Dive or Eco-tourism markets
The Swan Island Project as we envision it would bring in hundreds of thousands of tourists to Honduras that would not have considered vacationing in Honduras. The project would provide thousands of jobs on the islands and in support jobs on the mainland. The Swan Island Project would give the youth of Honduras a promise of a better future, through our scholarship program for college students wishing to work on the Swan Islands.
Mr. Walker is not taking into consideration what would be best for Honduras and is being selfish in his unwarranted attacks on a project that he could not get accomplished with his efforts.
The statement that Mr. Walker makes about the islands not being able to support the number of residents and tourists, is very small minded. The Principality of Monaco is roughly 75% the size of the main island and supports 35,000 residents and thousands of tourists at any one time. We believe that we do have a environmentally sound proposal for the development, and as Mr. Walker has not seen our proposals does not have any information from which to give his opinion.
Swan Island Development, LLC is giving Honduras the chance to make a statement to the tourism industry and the world, "Honduras is no longer looking to the past, but the FUTURE".
Sincerely,
Kevin E. Morrill
President
Swan Island Development, LLC
A Las Vegas Limited Liability Company
Via Internet
SWAN ISLAND DEVELOPMENT
Dear HTW,
I thought that after seeing the letter from Jack Walker in you readers forum, that you could possibly still be an unbiased and journalistic newspaper. My opinion was changed after reading the biased editorial comment by Mr. Rosenzweig in the Travel and Tourism section.
Mr. R while he has shown some ability to write, he obviously lacks the mental skills to think. He also lacks the journalistic skills to investigate a story before expressing his opinion.
The Swan Island Development Company while not succumbing to Mr. R's expertise on the feasibility of investing two billion dollars in the Swan Islands, we feel is better to accept the expertise of Economic Research Associates a world renowned company with the credentials of doing work for Disney, Universal and Sun International, owner of the Atlantis Resort on a small island in the Bahamas. The Atlantis resort and other developments on the small island largely owned by Sun International, will surpass the two billion being proposed to be spent on the Swan Islands which are roughly the same size.
Mr. R like most other journalist like to write only about the negative side of anything, without looking into any of the positives of any project. While two billion is a major investment for Honduras is approximately the average investment in most of the other developments that our group has been involved with.
I have no knowledge of the other ship project mentioned by Mr. R in his ramblings, and do not see any purpose in it except to cast dispersions on the Swan Island Project.
The Swan Island Project will be good for Honduras and it's people, and the project is proceeding on schedule despite pundits like Mr. R and your biased rag you call a newspaper. Hondurans one day will realize that there are reputable business people that do want to invest in and believe in the future of Honduras.
The greatest satisfaction I will receive is seeing the smiling faces on the guests and employees, as they arrive by the first cruise ships and commercial jets to the Swan Islands.
I am sure that you will not have the courage to print this reply.
Kevin E. Morrill
President
Swan Island Development, LLC
|

Official map of
Honduras. Updated 1994; Honduras-El Salvador border. Scale
1/500,000. Packed in its own special tube. $100.00 Contact Honduras
This Week, P.O. Box 1312, Tegucigalpa, Honduras CA.E-mail: hontweek@hondutel.hn
BILINGUAL
JOURNALIST WANTED.
SEND RESUME TO : HONDURAS THIS WEEK, P.O.BOX 1323, TEGUCIGALPA,
HONDURAS
Many
new ads in classifieds!
|
Got something on your mind? Put it in writing...
Honduras This Week welcomes letters to the editor.
Please include your name, address and phone number, if possible. Letters exceeding 200 words will be edited for size and content. We do not publish anonymous letters. |
|