|
OPINIONS & EDITORIAL |
| Monday, February 24, 2003 Online Edition 8 | |||||
Survival economy: In this analysis we will not take into consideration the
Economy degree offered at the National Autonomous University of Honduras (UNAH).
Their statements do not fit the current situation; indeed, we know very
little about their orientation. The fact that they cancelled the mathematics
studies in their curriculum only emphasizes how distant they are from the
real world.
|
|
||||
| Monday, February 17, 2003 Online Edition 7 | |||||
|
By LORENZO DEE BELVEAL As a long-time Latin America-watcher, it never occurred to this reporter that Nicaragua would be the nation to choose the path of reformation and lead the way to national respectability for the rest of the corruption-ridden “banana republics”. This reporter’s Nicaraguan exposures go back to the 1970’s, when Anastasio Somoza et familia were the de-facto dictators of the hapless ‘republica’, stealing what they could manage to carry - and collecting tribute on the balance of the nation’s natural and commercial resources. Without devolving into specifics concerning the Somoza rape and pillage of Nicaragua’s population and national wealth, suffice it to say that the iron-fisted strong-man and his henchmen roamed the country, taking what they wanted. They were lavishly assisted in these activities by a collaborating administration and a totally subservient judiciary. These functional appurtenances sufficed to provide a patina of due process to what would have otherwise been widely seen for what it was: the unblinking looting of a sovereign state, under the hypocritical trappings of consensual government. It was into this morass of disgraceful exploitation and administrative corruption that the Sandinista forces exploded, storming the Presidential Palace and driving the Somozas into exile - since departure was seen as preferable to summary execution. The nominal leader of the Sandinistas was a flinty-eyed reformer by the name of Eden Pastora. A clue to his personality is contained in the fact that he could have taken the monicker of Presidente, Generalissimo, or any other designation that suited his fancy. This because he was the head-man in every respect. But he modestly chose to be known as “Comandante Cero”. He never missed an opportunity to minimize his own role in the revolution that his forces precipitated, and to describe his crusade as a “movement of the people”. His energy and his faith in the cause were above question. He was willing to die for the liberation of Nicaragua - and he proved it on a hundred occasions. The Sandinistas prevailed against the combined Somoza resistance and a carpet-bagging “Contra” force, organized and financed by the United States of America. The U. S. intervention was later shown to have been an illegal - unconstitutional - adventure that had its origins in the Ronald Reagan White House. The caper was replete with cloak-and-dagger intrigues, illicit arms trades, subornation and collaboration that involved the highest levels of several governments - and in spite of all of this, the Sandinistas still prevailed! Never underestimate the power of a vision! Elections and supposedly popular government replaced Nicaragua’s old Somoza dictatorship. Considering that his work was finished, and with no interest in standing for election, himself, Eden Pastora, “Commandante Cero” sought refuge in a neighboring country and the Nicaraguan Palacio Presidencial was occupied by people named Ortega, Chamorra - and more recently, Arnoldo Aleman. The kind of civil outrages and blatant corruption that had surely triggered the Sandinista revolution initially, soon began to sully the images of the “gobierno popular”. Thievery and illicit privileges became the sorry reality of the fledgling “democracy” that had replaced the Somoza regime. But the seeds of rectitude were slumbering under the blanket of federal abuse and they would, in their time, not be denied. Arnoldo Aleman was elected Nicaraguan President in 1997. His Vice-President was one Enrique Bolanos. During the five Aleman years, 1997 to 2002, it is widely said that the usual patterns of corruption and personal privilege were given full sway. During this period in office, it is reliably alleged, Presidente Aleman stole in excess of one-hundred-million U. S. dollars, for the private enrichment of himself and his political collaborators. Some highly placed sources have put the total figure at multiples of that amount. The former Vice-President, Enrique Bolaños, stood for and was elected Nicaraguan President to succeed Aleman. When Bolanos took office in January, 2002, he promised the voters a thorough-going anti-corruption campaign against thieving politicians, among whom Arnoldo Aleman stood at the top of his “hit-list”. Like Honduras, the Nicaraguan Constitution confers legal immunity on its principal political functionaries. So President Bolanos went to the chamber of deputies and got them to pass a bill removing Aleman’s immunity from prosecution. Then he got a court order confining Aleman to house arrest, pending his being brought to trial. At the Bolanos instigation, the Nicaraguan Attorney General has charged Ex-president Aleman with illegally diverting and ‘laundering’ one-hundred-million dollars, later transferred to his private accounts for personal enrichment and a variety of other illicit activities. In addition to ex-president Aleman, thirteen (13) Aleman family members and former administration officials are also under related criminal charges, awaiting trial. In a recent speech to the nation, President Bolanos said, ‘’I have been true to my people in combating corruption and instilling a new cultural ethic of government. The National Assembly has also been true to Nicaragua today in this fight against corruption.’’ As stated previously, this reporter would never have guessed that Nicaragua would be the Latin nation to turn over its “new leaf” and take the road to respectability. There are several other Latin states that I considered much better candidates for reformation. Honduras quickly comes to mind. I had high hopes that Rafael Leonardo Callejas would prove to be the man to lead Honduras out of its morass of corruption and penury. He was well educated, capable and extremely popular. He seemed to have the tools for political miracle-working. Instead, he gave Honduras an administration that no less an authority than U. S. Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Jesse Helms labeled, “the most corrupt government in Honduras history”. My next candidate for savior of Honduras was Carlos Flores Facusse. He comes from a distinguished family. Graduated from a good stateside school. Operates a newspaper, among other family businesses, and presumably has enough money that he doesn’t need to steal. As it turned out, his venture into Honduras politics appears to have been a pure adventure. He failed to gain motivation from even the historic tragedy that arrived in the form of “Hurricane Mitch”. Presidente Flores appeared to enjoy the rounds of international socializing his office entailed, but he just couldn’t get interested in the day-to-day activities of governance. He was non-functional. He allowed things to happen all around him without his personal intervention. So when and from whence will a real “man on a white horse” arrive to duplicate for Honduras, the kind of unlikely socio-political miracle that Enrique Bolanos is putting together in Nicaragua? The case can be convincingly made that Honduras has more of the physical resources to underpin such a break with its disgraceful past than Nicaragua has. Certainly the Honduras people are no less intelligent and no less motivated than their Nicaraguan neighbors. Surely it is not for lack of incentive. Hondurans strive for a better life. Anyone who needs proof of this, consider the hundreds of thousands of desperate, poverty-stricken Hondurans who have quite literally taken their lives in their hands and made the long and hazardous trek northward, to become illegal entrants into the United States - in a desperate search for a living; for themselves and their endlessly deprived families. Many - too many of them have died in the effort. And all the while these life-and-death dramas are being played out, faithless political jackals back home are brazenly looting the nation of its resources and potentials, with not a perceptible thought for either the basic immorality of their depredations or the fate of the hapless millions that their unfeeling banditry and incompetence is victimizing. How much longer will this shameful charade continue to be played by so-called “public servants”, with living suffering people as the hapless pawns on the national gameboard? Surely there is someone, somewhere, among the millions who claim Honduras as their motherland, who has both the moral acuity and the intelligence to see a way out of the social and economic wilderness into which decades - no, centuries - of political abuse, fiscal irresponsibility and administrative chicanery has placed it. How long must Honduras wait for its deliverer who, like Enrique Bolanos in Nicaragua, will stand up and say enough is enough”. And then do something to rectify it. It won’t take a saint or a superman. But it will require a man of courage, vision and mission. Old habits die hard, and Honduras has lots of old, bad habits to shed on its way to a new national life. In the meantime it waits and prays for its deliverer. As Job put it, “How long, Oh Lord, how long?”
IN DEFENSE OF FOREIGN-BORN HISPANICS LIVING IN THE U
|
|
||||
| Monday, February 10, 2003 Online Edition 6 | |||||
The Nicaraguan case Our illiteracy is indeed of deep proportions, and it makes no difference whether it’s national congresses or international ministers who talk about it. If we talk about public officials, things get even worse; the issue of territorial problems must be treated in a formal manner. This situation deserves nothing less than our disdain within the Central American game: Costa Rica, probably the most privileged nation in the region, believes that sucking the blood of the rest of the region gives it the right to call itself the “Central American Switzerland”. Meanwhile Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica keep insisting on the unification of Central American. After taking office, President Portillo of Guatemala made a good point when he observed that the Central American Parliament (PARLACEN) is an irrelevant institution, and he is right. A refuge for many, PARLACEN condemned Nicaragua over its famous 35 percent tax, and ordered for Central American agreements to be reestablished. However, Nicaragua, with the help of certain friends in the region, has openly refused to do so. “The wolf is coming!” has been the threat of Honduras during three long years. During this time, the country has lost more than 400 million dollars and by being accused, has been discredited. As a result, relations with our Central American neighbors have deteriorated. In our opinion, these relations must be evaluated within a general context, so that the reciprocity measures in Nicaragua will apply to the rest of the region. Only then, will those who think they have bought the yard of Central America finally stop causing damage. Things have become so serious, that Nicaragua takes as fact
the agreement oriented at using Costa Rican Puerto Limon instead of our
Puerto Cortes. This is no joke, it is actually the introduction of something
big, ignoring this is equivalent to becoming an accomplice in order to favor
international interests. Hunger is tearing Nicaragua apart, and spirits are down.
Last January 18, the charges that ex-president Arnoldo Aleman had diverted 57
million dollars was confirmed. Moreover, they say that the best army in terms
of men and weapons remains the poorest one. Nicaragua even has SAM 7 rockets,
and it is the only country in Latin America with anti-atomic defense
equipment, BELIEVE IT OR NOT. This country has been the biggest Latin
American weapon exporter in the last 20 years. So we have many fronts to deal with. On one side El Salvador keeps on refusing to obey The Hague resolution and on the other side, Nicaragua keeps pushing for seizing our territorial sea. Behind every one, somebody else stands in the shadow. These differences in terms of years could last up to 50. On the other hand, there might be bad Hondurans who have engaged themselves in this game and, ever since Nicaragua confirmed there is petroleum in our adjacent seas, they have been frequently traveling to the Intercontinental Hotel in Managua to make “under the table” negotiations, thus increasing the fortune of wise Arnoldo Aleman. Let’s keep in mind that other interests are behind all
this, interests that are silently damaging the relations among the Central
America of Francisco Morazan. It is useful to distinguish between gangs whose members have been emotionally corrupted by the society in which they were born and raised —those who steal and kill to survive their OWN environment — and those committed to nihilistic agendas, such as the skinheads and other racially motivated thugs. Basking in its diversity, the United States endures both
kinds. The first category is composed almost entirely of Latinos. Black gangs
are thinning out. The second consists of middle class white youths, brought
up in a racist environment or later alienated by some personal misfortune and
driven to “take it out” on the most conspicuous groups — minorities. Criminal
gangs are largely energized by the atmosphere and attitudes present in their
communities. Racist gangs are inspired by feelings of inadequacy, frustration
and hatred toward a presumed tormentor. Hatred is contagious and in a world increasingly teetering on the brink of catastrophe, it is easy, under the right circumstances, to find a scapegoat for one’s misfortunes — real or perceived. Nazi Germany is a perfect example of millions of people enthusiastically dancing to Hitler’s music and fervently applauding, aiding and abetting the objectives of the “Final Solution.” All it takes for a society to spiral down the slippery road
to disintegration is a faltering economy, widespread public discontent — and
someone to blame. If Honduras had an honest, responsible, pragmatic and
compassionate political leadership — instead of successive dynasties of
vampires bent on getting rich — the number of gangs would dramatically
diminish. When people work, are well fed and treated with dignity, they
rarely engage in antisocial behavior. “We are to blame,” says distinguished Diario Tiempo commentator, Billy Pena. “We created a propitious climate for gangs to emerge because we have allowed corrupt, delinquent governments to treat the people shamelessly over the years. Now the mara monster is out of control, or better yet, it is controlling us.” President Maduro’s “Zero Tolerance” policy is a sonorous but empty, disingenuous slogan. Persecution will engender more crime, not less. The recipe offered by Radio America reporter Ernesto Alonso Rojas — that gang members ought to be summarily executed — is a monument of stupidity and barbarism. His rationale that “muerto el perro se acaba la rabia” should earn him instant dismissal by station owner Miguel Andonie Fernandez. Surely, Mr. Maduro understands that a nation racked with so
many social ills — corruption at all levels, rampant inflation, an
astronomical foreign debt, hunger, misery, injustice, crime and violence — is
incapable of policing itself. It will take a great leader, surrounded by
people of good will who put the nation’s interest ahead of their own to clean
up the mess.
|
Anti-Semitism high among Hispanic Americans By W. E. GUTMAN LOS ANGELES -- A nationwide survey released at year's end by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) shows an increase in the number of Americans manifesting anti-Semitic attitudes, reversing a 10-year decline and raising concerns that "an undercurrent of Jewish hatred persists in America." Conducted by an independent polling organization, the nationwide survey reveals that 17% of Americans - or about 35 million adults -- hold views about Jews that are "unquestionably anti-Semitic." Previous surveys commissioned by the ADL over the last decade had indicated that anti-Semitism was in decline. "We are greatly concerned that many of the gains we had seen in building a more tolerant America have not taken hold as firmly as we had hoped, and have to some degree been reversed," says Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director. "While there are many factors at play, all of the evidence suggests that a strong undercurrent of hared toward Jews persists in America." One of the most unsettling findings of the ADL poll concerns Hispanic Americans, the fastest growing minority in America. The poll reveals an extraordinary gap between those born in the U.S. and those born abroad. The survey reports that while 20% of Hispanics born in the U.S. express vague feelings of antipathy against the Jews, 44% of foreign-born Hispanics harbor hard-core, fossilized anti-Semitic convictions. This suggests that anti-Semitic views pre-exist entry into the U.S. and that these views continue to flourish in the insular, clannish and xenophobic atmosphere pervasive in Hispanic society in the U.S. The anti-Semitic propensities of foreign-born Hispanics are not surprising. Religious background and indoctrination has always played a role in determining one's attitude toward Jews. There is no doubt that this is a reflection of what is being learned about Jews in the schools, churches and communities of Hispanic nations, where Jews are a microscopic minority. Survey results conclude that: -- Anti-Semitic attitudes are up; the most widely held stereotype is that "Jews have too much power in the U.S." -- Anti-Semitism is a function of education. Less educated people are more likely to hold anti-Semitic views. -- Anti-Israel feelings trigger anti-Semitism. For the first time, negative attitudes toward Israel and concern that American Jews wield influence over U.S. Middle East policy are helping to foster anti-Semitic beliefs. -- Anti-Israel sentiments are used to fuel, legitimize and rationalize anti-Semitism." -- Anti-Semitism among foreign-born Hispanics is high. Perceptions of "Jewish control," influence and power as well as more traditional canards about Jews, religion and ethical practices appear to be driving anti-Semitism among foreign-born Hispanics. For example, more than half of foreign-born Hispanics agree with the assertion that "Jews don't care what happens to anyone but their own kind," whereas nearly half were raised to believe that "Jews are responsible for the death of Christ" Apt to fall into the most anti-Semitic category are: -- Those who believe that Jews have too much influence over U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. -- Those who view U.S. policy tilting too much toward Israel. -- Those who predict that the U.S. is more likely to be targeted for terrorist attacks because of America's support of Israel. The tragic events of September 11 and the crisis in the Middle East have clearly had an impact on the growth of anti-Semitism in America. As these life-altering events have transformed us as a nation, they have also resurrected the anti-Semitism that lay dormant beneath the surface. The explosive spread of Islam, which runs a formidable worldwide proselytizing machine, the spate of conversions to Islam taking place in Latin America and the unusually high rate of anti-Semitism among Hispanics in the U.S. are part of a trend issued from separate but converging dynamic processes. This alarming phenomenon, at a time of unease in a world ever closer to the brink of war, adds yet another dimension to the evil that spawned yesteryear's nightmares. W. E. Gutman is a veteran journalist. He lives and works in southern California.
|
||||
| Monday, February 3, 2003 Online Edition 5 | |||||
Municipal rights and taxes…
|
Democratization and reforms to the electoral system
|
||||
| Monday, January 20, 2003 Online Edition 3 | |||||
|
Deaths of young people remain unsolved
By ROBERT SPAIN
For their part, the police claim that many of
the deaths of the children are gang related. The ratio of male to female
deaths (90:10) approximately reflects the gender levels of gang membership,
however the methods of murder do not often fit the opus moderandi of Honduran
maras. Moreover, there are reams of testimony and instances suggesting that
the victims seem to have been chosen almost indiscriminately, some for just
being young and outside after dark. Gustavo Zelaya, legal advisor to the
Honduran branch of Casa Alianza is one such person, as is Police Commissioner
Maria Luisa Jimenez de Borjas, who is also of the opinion that there is a
marked police involvement in the killings. Suspended from her job as head of
the Internal Affairs Department of the National Police for her pursuit of
police killers (see accompanying article), Commissioner Borjas’ claims ring
true. The 1980s death squad M-316 - so named because it was formed from
military battalions 101, 105 and 110 (add them up) - has many veterans in the
upper echelons of the police force, and a series of shootings from a variety
of untraceable colored pickup trucks seen leaving crime scenes would fit into
their expertise. It is these crimes that make up an overwhelming number of
the unsolved murders that are seen as suggesting police incompetence or
complicity.
|
|
||||
| Monday, January 13, 2003 Online Edition 2 | |||||
|
|
||||
| Monday, January 6, 2003 Online Edition 1 | ||||||
|
In the name of Allah!
EDUCATION KEY TO DEVELOPMENT OVERFISHING |
Honduran Armed Forces:
IS DOCUMENT LEGAL?
|
|||||
|
|||||||